GRI responses 2011 - Mechanisms for shareholders and employees to provide recommendations or direction to the highest governance body.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Report scope and boundary
The primary processes used to identify the content for this, and for the group’s integrated annual report, centre on internal processes which include the risk management and strategy development procedure and processes, as well as employee engagement. External processes include engaging with customers, shareholders and principals/service providers, and to a lesser extent, regulators, industry associations and others.
In general, there is alignment between issues raised internally and those raised through external processes, although emphasis does vary in some cases. The stakeholder groupings noted are considered to be the most important to the group.
Given the group’s intense focus on engaging with employees, shareholders, customers and principals/service providers, Barloworld is acutely aware of the primary issues governing these relationships, what topics are important to these stakeholders, how to prioritise them, and hence what the focus for its reporting should be.
The group does not conduct focused engagement tailored for its annual report but uses on-going engagement throughout the year as the basis for defining report content. Through these processes, the group prioritises report content, and, via engagement, validates the importance of these issues with the concerned stakeholder group. The principle of materiality guides the prioritisation of topics identified during the stakeholder engagement process.
Barloworld uses the
GRI as a management tool. It endeavours to understand its position relative to all indicators but is mindful that not all indicators are of equal material concern to the organisation or its stakeholders. Nevertheless, the group believes that interrogating all indicators is important in the context of its value-creation approach.
In determining the materiality of issues, the nature of its response and content of this report, the group considers:
| • |
Its significant economic, environmental and social impacts on stakeholders |
| • |
Information that would substantively influence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders |
| • |
Its long-term strategy as well as short-term economic impact on its stakeholders and how its performance will affect them |
| • |
Its commitments in terms of its policies, undertakings and the external regulatory environment, including the listing requirements of relevant stock exchanges |
| • |
The activities of peers and trends in relevant industries, as well as best practice |
| • |
Issues and expectations emerging from its various stakeholder engagement activities |
| • |
General expectations of relevant emerging codes and reporting frameworks, including the Global Reporting Initiative and appropriate socially responsible reporting indices such as the JSE Socially Responsible Investment index (JSE SRI). Where appropriate, these are factored into operational management systems, discussed with relevant stakeholders and addressed in reports |
| • |
The three step process for defining report content as recommended by the GRI; identification, prioritisation and validation. |
The risk and sustainability committee considers the materiality of non-financial indicators and selects those for external assurance. An assurance matrix, which is based on the GRI framework and includes materiality, is under review. The group’s stakeholder engagement initiatives identify and highlight material issues which influence and inform the group’s reporting, strategy and operations as well as prioritising issues for reporting purposes.
Barloworld also prioritises report content by assessing the year under review and deciding which aspects require more detail and attention than others based on its framework used in determining materiality across environmental, social and economic spectrum.
The group is committed to ensuring credibility, clarity, completeness and comparability of reported information and uses the Global Reporting Initiative (G3.1) indicators to ensure alignment with global reporting practices. Relevance and materiality of reported data is continually reviewed in light of the group’s structure, activities and stakeholder engagement. Quantitative and qualitative aspects are considered in the assessment of materiality.
Organisational boundaries for collecting data reflect those used for financial purposes to align our financial, environmental and social reporting. Data is collected at operational level and consolidated at divisional and group levels. Reporting structures and boundaries for greenhouse gas emissions are also aligned with the Greenhouse Gas (
GHG) Protocol corporate standard.