4.1 - 4.17
-
4.1 Governance structure of the organisation, including committees under the highest governance body responsible for specific tasks, such as setting strategy or organisational oversight .
Integrated annual report 2011 - Report scope and boundary
Integrated annual report 2011 - Board of directors
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
The board and its committees are constituted in terms of the requirements of the Companies Act and The King Report on Governance for South Africa (King III), and are governed by written terms of reference.
The board recognises it is the central point for and custodian of corporate governance. As such, the board always strives to ensure that the group aligns itself with local and international codes of good corporate governance, seeks to apply best practice and follows relevant trends of good corporate governance.
King III became effective in the group’s 2011 financial year. The board initiated a gap analysis to determine the extent to which Barloworld applied the principles and recommended practices in King III.
This analysis identified the governance principles already being applied and those that the company needed to address. The analysis also identified areas of improvement or ways in which the group’s governance practices could be enhanced.
The group applies the governance principles contained in King III and continues to further entrench and strengthen recommended governance practices in its governance structures, systems, processes and procedures.
The company’s 2010 annual report, was ranked third in the Nkonki/Financial Mail Integrated Reporting Awards held in July 2011. The awards considered the extent to which companies on the JSE Top 40 index and on the JSE’s Socially Responsible Investment index complied with the integrated reporting disclosure requirements of King III.
Membership of the board, which is the ultimate governance structure as well as the group’s other governance structures, is reflected in the table below.
| |
Name |
|
Year
appointed |
Audit |
General purposes |
Nomina-
tion |
Remunera-
tion |
Risk and
sustain-
ability |
*Social,
Ethics and
Transformation |
|
| |
Independent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DB Ntsebeza (chairman) |
Dumisa (BM) (61) |
1999 |
|
Chairman |
Chairman |
Member |
|
Member |
|
| |
SAM Baqwa |
Selby (BM) (60) |
2005 |
Member |
Member |
Member |
|
|
Member |
|
| |
AGK Hamilton |
Gordon (WM) (66) |
2007 |
Chairman |
Member |
Member |
Member |
Member |
|
|
| |
SS Mkhabela |
Sibongile (BF) (66) |
2006 |
|
|
Member |
|
|
Chairman |
|
| |
MJN Njeke |
Johnson (BM) (52) |
2009 |
Member |
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
|
| |
SS Ntsaluba |
Sango (BM) (51) |
2008 |
Member |
|
|
Member |
Chairman |
|
|
| |
SB Pfeiffer |
Steve (WM) (64) |
2001 |
|
Member |
Member |
Chairman |
|
|
|
| |
G Rodriquez de Castro Garcia de los Rios |
Gonzalo (WM) (69) |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
| |
Non-independent, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TH Nyasulu |
Hixonia (BF) (57) |
2007 |
|
Member |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CB Thomson (chief executive) |
Clive (WM) (45) |
2003 |
|
Member |
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
| |
PJ Blackbeard |
John (WM) (54) |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
| |
PJ Bulterman |
Peter (WM) (55) |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
|
| |
M Laubscher |
Martin (WM) (51) |
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
|
| |
OI Shongwe |
Isaac (BM) (49) |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
| |
DG Wilson |
Don (WM) (54) |
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
|
Key: BM = Black male; BF = Black Female; WM = White male; Figure in brackets () is age of director.
* Previously the empowerment and transformation committee, the committee was reconstituted as the social, ethics and
transformation committee.
Board composition by percentage
| |
Age |
|
|
|
|
| |
< 50 yrs |
50 - 60 yrs |
> 60 yrs |
Male |
Female |
White |
Other |
| |
13% |
60% |
27% |
87% |
13% |
53% |
47% |
-
4.2 Indicate whether the Chair of the highest governance body is also an executive officer
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
The chair of the highest governance body, the board of directors, is not an executive officer.
No individual has unfettered powers of decision-making. Responsibility for running the board and executive responsibility for conducting the business are differentiated. Advocate Dumisa Ntsebeza SC, an independent non-executive director, is chairman of the board and Clive Thomson, an executive director, is chief executive officer.
The roles of the chairman and chief executive are separate and clearly defined. The chairman is responsible for leadership of the board, ensuring its effectiveness on all aspects of its role and setting its agenda. The chief executive provides leadership to the executive team in running the business and co-ordinates proposals developed by the executive committee for consideration by the board.
-
4.3 For organizations that have a unitary board structure, state the number and gender of members of the highest governance body that are independent and/or non-executive members.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Equality, empowerment and transformation
Integrated annual report 2011 - Board of directors
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Considerable thought is given to board balance and composition. Collectively the board believes that the current mix of knowledge, skill and experience meets requirements to lead the company effectively. The board has 15 directors, comprising nine non-executive directors, and six executive directors.
The Barloworld board has a majority of independent non-executive directors. The board considers eight of the nine non-executive directors to be independent. Ms Hixonia Nyasulu is not regarded as independent given of her participation, either directly or indirectly in the company’s black ownership transaction that resulted in some 10% of the company’s equity issued to black partners.
| |
Name |
|
Year
appointed |
Audit |
General purposes |
Nomina-
tion |
Remunera-
tion |
Risk and
sustain-
ability |
*Social,
Ethics and
Transformation |
|
| |
Independent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DB Ntsebeza (chairman) |
Dumisa (BM) (61) |
1999 |
|
Chairman |
Chairman |
Member |
|
Member |
|
| |
SAM Baqwa |
Selby (BM) (60) |
2005 |
Member |
Member |
Member |
|
|
Member |
|
| |
AGK Hamilton |
Gordon (WM) (66) |
2007 |
Chairman |
Member |
Member |
Member |
Member |
|
|
| |
SS Mkhabela |
Sibongile (BF) (66) |
2006 |
|
|
Member |
|
|
Chairman |
|
| |
MJN Njeke |
Johnson (BM) (52) |
2009 |
Member |
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
|
| |
SS Ntsaluba |
Sango (BM) (51) |
2008 |
Member |
|
|
Member |
Chairman |
|
|
| |
SB Pfeiffer |
Steve (WM) (64) |
2001 |
|
Member |
Member |
Chairman |
|
|
|
| |
G Rodriquez de Castro Garcia de los Rios |
Gonzalo (WM) (69) |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
| |
Non-independent, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TH Nyasulu |
Hixonia (BF) (57) |
2007 |
|
Member |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CB Thomson (chief executive) |
Clive (WM) (45) |
2003 |
|
Member |
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
| |
PJ Blackbeard |
John (WM) (54) |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
| |
PJ Bulterman |
Peter (WM) (55) |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
|
| |
M Laubscher |
Martin (WM) (51) |
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
|
| |
OI Shongwe |
Isaac (BM) (49) |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
Member |
|
| |
DG Wilson |
Don (WM) (54) |
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Member |
|
|
Key: BM = Black male; BF = Black Female; WM = White male; Figure in brackets () is age of director.
* Previously the empowerment and transformation committee, the committee was reconstituted as the social, ethics and
transformation committee.
Board composition by percentage
| |
Age |
|
|
|
|
| |
< 50 yrs |
50 - 60 yrs |
> 60 yrs |
Male |
Female |
White |
Other |
| |
13% |
60% |
27% |
87% |
13% |
53% |
47% |
-
4.4 Mechanisms for shareholders and employees to provide recommendations or direction to the highest governance body.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Stakeholder engagement
Integrated annual report 2011 - Our people
Integrated annual report 2011 - Our people
Integrated annual report 2011 - Letter from chairman
Integrated annual report 2011 - Question form for annual general meeting
Integrated annual report 2011 - Shareholders’ diary and map
Integrated annual report 2011 - Notice of Annual General Meeting
Integrated annual report 2011 - Form of proxy
Integrated annual report 2011 - Notes to proxy
The company is a strong proponent of transparency, best-practice disclosure, consistent communication and equal and timely dissemination of information to shareholders. It encourages an active participation by shareholders at general meetings and maintains an investor relations programme which, inter alia, organises for corporate and divisional executives to attend regular meetings with shareholders and potential investors.
The company has regular dialogue with institutional shareholders where it believes this to be in the interests of shareholders generally. Feedback from these visits is shared with the board. The chairman routinely offers key shareholders the opportunity of meeting to discuss governance, strategy or other matters.
The interests of private shareholders remain paramount and, recognising their needs, our website contains a range of investor relations and material issues, including an update on activities, copies of all presentation materials given to institutional investors and further explanation of matters in the integrated report.
The Annual General Meeting is normally attended by all directors. Shareholders are encouraged to attend and to ask questions. They also have the opportunity to meet with directors after formal proceedings have ended.
The notice of annual general meeting, detailing all proposed resolutions appears in the integrated annual report.
Barloworld complies with all legal communication requirements. The group regularly engages its shareholders and the investor community through a number of interventions, including:
| • |
Bi-annual results presentations |
| • |
Annual general meetings |
| • |
Annual reporting |
| • |
Investor conferences and presentations |
| • |
Investor site visits |
| • |
Media releases |
| • |
Focused surveys |
Employee engagement processes provide opportunities for our people to make recommendations and influence direction and include:
| • |
Individual meetings |
| • |
Structured team forums |
| • |
Individual and team performance discussions |
| • |
Briefings |
| • |
Strategic plan briefings |
| • |
Anonymous, structured individual perception surveys |
| • |
Global leaders conferences at which the top leadership team participates in formulating the company’s strategy and related issues. These are held every two years, with the most recent conference in March 2011. |
Company contacts
-
4.5 Linkage between compensation for members of the highest governance body, senior managers, and executives (including departure arrangements), and the organization's performance (including social and environmental performance).
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Remuneration report
The remuneration committee makes recommendations to the board on the structure and development of policy on executive and senior management remuneration, taking into account market conditions. It determines the criteria necessary to measure the performance of executive directors in discharging their functions and responsibilities. It also determines remuneration packages for the chief executive officer and executive directors of the company.
For non-executive directors, the committee makes recommendations to the board on fees to be paid to each non-executive director for services rendered as a member of the board or a board sub-committee. Once these fees have been adopted by the board, they are submitted to shareholders in the general meeting for approval prior to implementation and payment. Details of fees proposed to shareholders for approval are set out in the notice of annual general meeting.
Where appropriate, the committee consults with the chief executive or other executive or non-executive directors in fulfilling their duties under the committee’s terms of reference.
Key responsibilities and role of the committee include:
| • |
Determining any criteria necessary to measure the performance of executive directors in discharging their functions and responsibilities |
| • |
Reviewing the terms and conditions of the chief executive and executive directors’ service agreements, taking into account relevant market information and information from comparable companies where relevant, to ensure that they are fairly, but responsibly appraised and rewarded for their individual contributions towards enhancing the company’s performance |
| • |
Determining specific remuneration packages for the chief executive and executive directors of the company, including but not limited to basic salary, benefits in kind, any annual bonuses, performance-based incentives, share-based incentives, pensions and other benefits |
| • |
Determining any grants to executive directors and other senior employees made pursuant to any executive share scheme adopted by the company in the annual general meeting. |
Executive incentivisation includes addressing central aspects of group strategy including sustainable development objectives such as energy and emissions efficiency. Managing of this process is facilitated through an integrated performance scorecard system.
-
4.6 Processes in place for the highest governance body to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
The board recognises the importance of acting in the best interest of the company and protecting the legitimate interests and expectations of its stakeholders. The board consistently applies the provisions of the South Africa Companies Act and JSE listing requirements on disclosing or avoiding conflicts of interest. Directors are required to declare their interests in general annually, and specifically at each meeting of the board.
Among other measures to deal with conflicts of interest the company has a policy that addresses accepting gifts. This requires that gifts be officially declared and registered on the company’s gift register.
-
4.7 Process for determining the composition, qualifications, and expertise of the members of the highest governance body and its committees, including any consideration of gender and other indicators of diversity.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
To ensure a rigorous and transparent procedure, any appointment of a director is considered by the board as a whole, on recommendation of the nomination committee.
The selection process involves considering of the existing balance of skills and experience and continuously assessing the needs of the company. Barloworld’s commitment to empowerment and transformation and the ideal that its employee and leadership profile should reflect the society in which it operates, is an essential element of this process. Non-executive directors are required to devote sufficient time to the company’s affairs.
While there is no formal limit on the number of other appointments directors can hold, approval must be obtained from the chairman prior to accepting additional commitments that may affect the time that can be devoted to the company. Non-executive directors are required to advise the board of subsequent changes or additional commitments from time to time as approved by the chairman.
Executive directors are permitted to accept external non-executive board appointments limited to a single external ‘for profit’ board.
Independence of non-executive directors
The Barloworld board has a majority of independent non-executive directors. The board considered the independence of directors, evaluating the rationale and purport of the requirements of independence in King III. An assessment, considering the salient factors and unique circumstances of each person, was performed for each non-executive director.
In addition, the independence of non-executives who have served on the board for longer than nine years was assessed. The board is satisfied that eight of the nine current non-executive directors are independent.
Hixonia Nyasulu is not regarded as independent in view of her participation, either directly or indirectly, in the black ownership transaction that resulted in some 10% of the company’s equity being issued to black partners. Despite the determination reached on Ms Nyasulu, the board believes that the skills, knowledge and experience of this director remain valuable to the organisation.
-
4.8 Internally developed statements of mission or values, codes of conduct, and principles relevant to economic, environmental, and social performance and the status of their implementation.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Group vision and strategy
Integrated annual report 2011 - Stakeholder engagement
Integrated annual report 2011 - Limiting our environmental footprint
Integrated annual report 2011 - Equality, empowerment and transformation
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
A number of these have been developed and contextualised in an overall framework.
The commitment to building and sustaining an ethical organisational culture is entrenched in the company’s vision, mission, strategies and operations. The board assumes ultimate responsibility for the company’s ethics performance by delegating to executive management the task of setting up a well-designed and properly implemented ethics management process.
In May 2011 the board approved an ethics and compliance programme for the group. This is designed to further entrench and integrate the requirements of good corporate governance throughout the group. The programme addresses ethics and governance, include executive commitment, the worldwide code of conduct, systems infrastructure and due-diligence standards. The compliance standards provide the operational requirements for setting and maintaining policies, training, communication and reporting.
The business of the group and its relationship with stakeholders is governed by a worldwide code of code of conduct and a code of ethics, both are approved by the board.
The worldwide code of conduct articulates Barloworld’s commitment to doing business the right way, according to best practices, guided by the values of integrity, excellence, teamwork and commitment. The code of ethics enjoins Barloworld directors, management, employees and stakeholders to obey the law, respect others, be fair, honest and protect the environment.
These guiding principles are supported by a group anti-fraud policy and a further policy dealing with directors and prescribed officers, agents, distributors, intermediaries, trade restrictions, export controls and sanctions. All these instruments appear on our website (view pdf downloads below).
The company also maintains an Ethics Hotline introduced in South Africa in 2002. This is an independent and confidential system for stakeholders to report unethical, dishonest or risky behaviour, including non-compliance with company policies, as well as corruption and fraud. All incidents reported are investigated and, where appropriate, action is taken.
The hot line is outsourced to Tip-offs Anonymous, an independent body within Deloitte, the group’s external auditors. Our commitment not to victimise whistle-blowers, as prescribed in legislation, enables transparency and promotes ethical conduct.
The board and management understand that the company is not only an economic entity but a corporate citizen and, as such, it has a social and moral standing in society with all the responsibilities of that status.
The board is therefore responsible for ensuring that the group protects, enhances and invests in the wellbeing of the economy, society and natural environment and pursues its activities within the limits of social, political and environmental responsibilities outlined in international conventions on human rights.
To give effect to the group’s commercial, social and moral responsibilities, a number of standards, guidelines, policies and codes of practice apply, including:
-
4.9 Procedures of the highest governance body for overseeing the organisation's identification and management of economic, environmental, and social performance, including relevant risks and opportunities, and adherence or compliance with internationally agreed standards, codes of conduct, and principles.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
There are essentially three aspects to this:
The newly constituted social, ethics and transformation committee’s responsibilities include adherence and compliance to internationally agreed standards, codes of conduct and principles, including those in the United Nations Global Compact.
The board is responsible for ensuring that the group complies with applicable laws and regulations and considers adhering to non-binding rules, codes and standards.
The board recognises that the group’s operations cover many jurisdictions. These are at different levels of maturity and the rule of law exists in varying degrees with hybrid systems of governance developing in some instances.
The board strives to ensure appropriate structures, processes and procedures with appropriate checks and balances are established to assist it in discharging its legal responsibilities and overseeing legislative compliance.
Processes are also in place to ensure that the board is kept abreast of significant developments in applicable laws, rules, codes and standards. Compliance risk thus forms an integral part of the company’s risk management process and the board delegates to management implementation of an effective compliance framework and associated processes.
The board and management understand the company is not only an economic entity but a corporate citizen and, as such, it has a social and moral standing in society with attendant responsibilities.
The board is therefore responsible for ensuring the group protects, enhances and invests in the wellbeing of the economy, society and natural environment and pursues its activities within the limits of the social, political and environmental responsibilities outlined in international conventions on human rights.
Identifying of risks and opportunities follows a robust and systematic process. A comprehensive risk management policy is in place throughout the group, complemented by the Barloworld Limited risk management philosophy. This includes dedicated divisional risk assessments with internal audit and group risk management services present. Risk management is incorporated into the group’s strategic planning process.
In line with international best practice, risks are assessed on their probability, severity and quality of the existing control environment. These measures result in residual risk scores that indicate the importance of the risk and evaluate assessment of progress in addressing identified risks.
Risks are detailed, comprehensively assessed and managed through acceptance, transfer, avoidance or reduction measures. Details are recorded in divisional and group risk registers.
Formal reporting to the risk and sustainability committee takes place bi-annually and to the board annually. Initiatives to address identified risks include developing and implementing business continuity and disaster recovery plans. These include information technology and communications solutions as appropriate.
While this planning is regularly reviewed at executive and board levels, internal audit plays a significant role in reviewing processes, procedures and controls.
Barloworld group top risks – 2011
These risks are presented in alphabetical order
| Key risks |
Category of risk and management response |
|
| Acquisition underperformance
The risk of future net cash flows from
acquisitions failing to realise the projections
upon which the initial purchase
consideration was based may lead to value
destruction for shareholders and a need to
impair the related goodwill or assets. |
Acquisition risk
 |
A business acquisition policy and procedure is in place
that sets out a structured approach and framework to be
used when acquisitions are being made. This includes
a
pre-acquisition phase that includes the requirement to
conduct a comprehensive strategic analysis of intended
targets, development of acquisition criteria, both strategic
and financial, and quantification of risk-adjusted value
creation potential for the respective business unit and the
group. |
 |
The CEOs and CFOs of each business unit are responsible
for ensuring that the policy and procedures are adhered
to. |
 |
Following acquisitions, planning and task teams are
established to focus on the realisation and management
of possible synergies. |
|
|
| Competitor actions
Competitor actions will erode our
competitive position and have a significant
impact on the value we create for
shareholders. |
Competitor risk
 |
Continually reduce costs by focusing on operational
efficiencies and staff training. |
 |
Continually improve service and the provision of
innovative solutions to customers. |
 |
Develop key customer plans which contain all the
information and strategies to satisfy the customer. |
|
|
| Currency volatility
Movement of currencies against one
another, mainly the movement of other
currencies against the rand which creates
risks relative to the translation of non-rand
profits, the marking-to-market of financial
instruments taken out to hedge currency
exposures and the cost of imports into
South Africa. |
Financial risk
 |
The responsibility for monitoring and managing these risks
is that of line management. A group treasury policy is in
place which clearly sets out the philosophy of hedging,
guideline parameters within which to operate and
permissible financial instruments to be utilised. |
 |
Preventive measures are implemented around
determination of pricing mechanisms and structuring of
commercial contracts to reduce the impact of any adverse
currency fluctuations. |
|
|
| Defined benefit scheme exposure
One of the key risks for the UK’s defined
benefit scheme over the past few years has
been the reduced real yield on AA-rated
corporate bonds which is used to value the
liabilities. In addition, increased life
expectancy of members will have an adverse
impact on the scheme’s funding position.
Market volatility remains a risk, with 50%
of the scheme’s assets invested in equities,
although a small (8%) diversification into
absolute return funds was made in the year.
A deterioration in the funding level may
require additional company contributions
over and above the scheme’s current normal
contribution rates.
The year-end valuation indicates that the
deficit has increased to approximately £71 million, largely due to an adjustment in
the longevity assumptions as compared to
the September 2010 year-end and reduced
asset yields. |
Market risk
 |
A suitably qualified representative board of trustees
exists which, together with a separate investment
sub-committee, is responsible for regularly evaluating the
effectiveness of investment decisions. Professional
investment advisors are used to assist in the management
of the investment portfolios with a view to conservatively
preserving and enhancing fund valuations. Complex
investment risk models are run by the investment advisors
and actuaries to assess optimum risk balance. The actuary
also conducts regular valuations. |
 |
Funding shortfalls are planned to be made up within
sensible time frames via market-anticipated increased
interest rates, positive returns on investments and
potentially increased company and/or employee
contributions. |
 |
The defined benefit scheme in the UK was closed to new
members in 2002 and benefits were changed to a CARE
basis in 2006 to assist in managing future liabilities. The
scheme is now mature with only 7% active membership.
All new employees in the UK are automatically enrolled in
the UK’s defined contribution scheme. |
|
|
| Dependence on principals and suppliers
Some of the businesses in the group are
dependent on a small number of principals
and/or suppliers.
Our success is therefore linked to their
ongoing financial stability, the
competitiveness and quality of their
products and services and the availability
of equipment to meet customers’ needs.
In order to ensure sustainable value
creation, we depend on suppliers of
infrastructure in the countries in which
we operate. Most of our businesses are
dependent, inter alia, on reliable power and
water supply and appropriate transport
networks. |
Strategic risk
 |
Add value by giving constant feedback to our principals
on market movements and product competitiveness. |
 |
Continually improve/build our relationships with our
principals and major suppliers and attempt to ensure
that we are a preferred dealer/customer. |
 |
Provide excellent customer service and lead in our
markets. |
 |
Build long-term partnerships with customers. |
 |
Build relationships with local authorities. |
 |
Align strategies and targets with those of our major
principals as far as possible. |
|
|
Exposure to political risks, terrorism and
crime in the countries in which we
operate
The group's people and assets are spread
through numerous countries around the
world, while our activities are conducted in
many more. The possibility exists that our
people and assets, and the viability of the
businesses, are exposed through acts of
terrorism, political turmoil or crime in some of
the regions in which the group operates, as
well as in those that may be the subject of
expansion. Business growth initiatives require
that new markets and territories are the focus
of our business expansion. These opportunities
come with their own distinct risk exposures. |
Operational risk
 |
Minimise exposure in high-risk countries through
thorough and in-depth risk assessments, coupled with the
application of preventive and corrective risk management
activities. |
 |
Maintain flexible business models. |
 |
Maintain Business Continuity Plans that incorporate
emergency response actions, crisis management and
business recovery plans specific to the businesses and the
respective territories in which the businesses operate. |
|
|
Exposure to significant customers and
dependence on channels to market
The risk that we are exposed to certain large
customers and/or industries and that
well-established distribution channels may
change or consolidate. |
Market risk
 |
Build long-term partnerships with customers |
 |
Develop customer solutions which differentiate and
expand our offering from product-based businesses. |
 |
Diversify customer base. |
 |
Develop new channels. |
|
|
| Slow recovery of global economies
The effect of the prolonged slowdown on
our businesses, customers, suppliers and
funders and the continued risk that funding
constraints within the supply chains could
result in a double-dip recession and/or
impede growth. This, in turn, could lower
commodity prices and impact mining
company investments. |
Financial risk
 |
Inflationary pressures to be carefully monitored and
managed, as appropriate, in each business. |
 |
Reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies. |
 |
Monitor our customers’ ability to spend and access credit. |
 |
Reduce working capital, limit capital expenditure and
improve cash flow. |
 |
Secure adequate committed borrowing facilities. |
|
|
| Regulatory environment
Many of the group’s activities are governed
by regulations. Due to the complexity and
changing nature of these regulations across
the industries and geographical spectrum of
the group’s activities, there are challenges in
staying abreast of all developments and
maintaining full compliance. |
Regulatory risk
 |
Management is responsible for the ongoing monitoring of
all pending and actual changes to the group’s regulatory
environment. Due to the large number of jurisdictions
which govern the group’s activities, this monitoring occurs
in each relevant country of operation. |
 |
Where feasible, the group will comment on proposed
changes to the regulatory environment that may adversely
affect the group in a particular jurisdiction. |
|
|
| Strategic employee skills
Barloworld’s key asset is the intellectual
capacities and skills of its employees. This
necessitates ongoing management of the
challenges regarding recruitment, succession
planning, skills retention and development. |
Employee risk
 |
Barloworld has a comprehensive employee approach and
related set of initiatives to align employees with the
strategy of the organisation. |
 |
These identify and align all employee elements of a
value-creating organisation to ensure sustainable
intellectual capacity and value-creation competence. |
 |
Through performance management systems, employees’
purpose, role, function and accountabilities are defined,
and, using competency-based assessments, employees
are regularly reviewed to ensure the appropriate skill
sets are available to enable performance at optimum
levels |
 |
Investments in training resources and facilities are
continuing to assist and encourage employees to enhance
their levels of competence and performance. |
 |
An appropriate suite of reward and incentive schemes
ensures recognition, value-creation for employees and
retention of high-performing employees. |
|
|
-
4.10 Processes for evaluating the highest governance body's own performance, particularly with respect to economic, environmental, and social performance.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Corporate governance report
Annually, the performance of the chairman, chief executive officer and the board as a whole is appraised. The chairman and chief executive officer do not participate in discussions on their own performance. The chairman holds formal and informal meetings with individual directors during the year and, at the end of the year, there is a formal evaluation exercise.
After the performance evaluation of individual directors by their peers in 2011, the chairman discussed results with individual directors to obtain comment on issues raised by peers and to provide advice, guidance and offer assistance where appropriate.
The group’s Annual General Meeting, full-year and interim result presentations and other ad hoc and ongoing stakeholder interventions give external stakeholders an opportunity to review the board’s performance against an open set of criteria including economic, environmental and social performance.
-
4.11 Explanation of whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed by the organisation.
The group is mindful of the precautionary principle and its related obligations. Its ethics and structured risk management approach ensures that future risks to the public and the environment from its activities are identified and considered. Activities related to any identified risk are addressed. This applies to all group activities, including building new facilities. The group’s leading principals would be mindful of this principle in developing and introducing new products.
-
4.12 Externally developed economic, environmental, and social charters, principles, or other initiatives to which the organization subscribes or endorses.
-
4.13 Memberships in associations (such as industry associations) and/or national/international advocacy organisations in which the organization.
-
4.14 List of stakeholder groups engaged by the organisation.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Stakeholder engagement
Barloworld recognises that its value-creation activities are underpinned by stakeholder engagement, understanding stakeholder expectations and the impact of these relations on its strategic direction. Stakeholders are identified through a number of criteria, engaged in a variety of ways and on a range of issues. Accountability for stakeholder engagement is centred in operational management and functional structures in the group.
One of the aims of Barloworld’s strategic stakeholder engagement is to identify and expand the links between social improvement and business success, the group’s competitiveness and the health of the communities around it being closely intertwined. This ‘shared value’ intelligence is used to understand and serve the emerging needs in society, such as the provision of products with lower environmental impacts, for instance, to gain operating efficiencies and to anticipate risks and opportunities in the broader environment.
The group appreciates the role of social media in stakeholder engagement and strives to implement structures and systems, as well as allocate resources, in a way that uses the medium to the group and its customers' advantage.
View the group’s stakeholder policy.
Stakeholder matrix
| Shareholders and
providers of capital
Central to sourcing and
securing capital;
Compliance with all
legal communication
requirements |
Bi-annual presentations
of results;
Annual general meeting;
Annual reporting;
Investor conferences and
presentations;
Investor site visits;
Ad hoc media releases
(see also Governance
section) |
Competitive return on
investment;
Strategic direction;
market perspectives;
Value creation
performance;
Business unit
performance;
Strategy and identified
growth opportunities;
Group’s legitimacy;
Sound governance
structures |
Communicate early in
an honest and
transparent manner;
Strategic issues are
considered and
appropriately addressed
through group
structures;
Executive resource in
place to manage
investor relations |
| Customers
Understanding customer
sentiment;
Understanding customer
requirements;
Business sustainability;
Long-term relationships;
Mutual benefit;
Identifying potential risks
to, and opportunities for,
the business |
Numerous individual and
collective customer
engagements/
interventions take place
during the year;
Regular visits by senior
executives;
Open days and site visits;
Anonymous surveys;
Entrenched in ISO 9001
standard;
Customer satisfaction
surveys
|
Value of product, service
and solution provided;
Ability to enhance
customers’ value
creation activity;
Service level agreements |
Delivery of required
products, services and
customer solutions;
Respect for rights of
consumers;
Provide information that
is honest and relevant;
Ongoing customer
contact and interaction |
| Employees and their
representatives
Sustainable value
creation for and by
employees;
Employer of choice |
Individual meetings;
Structured team forums;
Individual and team
performance discussions;
Intellectual capital
reviews;
Team briefings;
In South Africa: work
skills and employment
equity forums are
established;
Anonymous individual
perception monitoring
(IPM) surveys, conducted
at least once every two
years throughout the
organisation, examine
employee perceptions on
a range of issues;
Meeting with employee
representatives including
trade unions in terms of
recognition and industry/
national agreements |
Strategy, company
performance andresults;
Individual conditions of
employment;
Security of employment;
Health and safety issues;
Career path and
development;
In South Africa,
work-skills plans and
progress on employment
equity |
Alignment with
leadership philosophy;
Continual review of
employee value
proposition to ensure
employee attraction and
retention, including:
 |
Conducive/flexible
work environment |
 |
Responsible HR
management |
 |
Equitable
remuneration system |
 |
Open and flexible
communication |
Investment in employee
development;
Sustainable
organisational
restructuring;
Awareness of strategic
objectives and individual
roles |
| Principals and
suppliers
Delivery of competitive
integrated customer
solutions;
Mutual benefit;
Long-term relationships;
Governance framework;
Strategic frameworks |
Dealer, licensee and
dealer council meetings;
Principals’ conferences;
Formal reporting and
information sharing;
Ongoing informal
contact;
Product launches;
Supply chain
management |
Product issues and
innovation;
Market positioning;
Financial and other
performance reviews;
Customer issues and
satisfaction;
Sustainable development
matters;
Territory issues and
expansions;
Market information;
Supply chain
empowerment |
Successful relationships
with mutual value
maximised;
Leading products and
services;
Retained distribution
rights;
Expanded distribution
areas/regions/ territories;
Mitigation of an
identified key risk;
Supply chain
optimisation;
Terms and conditions of
relationship updated and
maintained;
Expanded preferential
procurement and
empowerment |
| Public sector
Government institutions,
departments and
training authorities;
Municipal and local
authorities;
Diplomatic corps |
Consultation on
emerging policy
frameworks;
Compliance issues;
Progress on employment
equity plans;
Fiscal and local issues
such as building plans;
Training programmes
and rebates;
Technical and financial
assistance for socioeconomic
development
(SED) |
Provision of critical
public assets and a
supportive environment;
Socio-economic
development in South
Africa;
Emerging policy and
regulations on climate
change response and
carbon taxes |
Social compacts and
creation of shared value;
Collaboration on
achievement of social
and economic
development objectives;
Consultation on
emerging policy |
| Civil society and local
communities
Industry associations and
organised business
organisations;
Non-governmental
organisations;
Beneficiaries of the
company’s socioeconomic
(SED) and
enterprise development
(ED) initiatives;
Guidance and global
best practice |
Relevant industry issues,
industry lobbying and
responses to proposed
legislation or regulation;
Consultation with, and
evaluation of,
educational,
environmental and
welfare organisations |
Relevant industry issues,
industry lobbying and
responses to proposed
legislation or regulation;
Development initiatives
evaluated for leadership,
technical and financial
support;
Enterprise development
opportunities identified |
Relevant industry
responses submitted;
Social compacts and
creation of shared value;
Appropriate initiatives
supported through
company’s ED and SED
initiatives;
Appropriate executive
and leadership
interventions
implemented;
Climate change
response interventions
including COP 17
participation |
| Empowerment
partners
Mutual value creation/
benefit |
Ad hoc meetings;
Structured interventions;
Operational meetings;
Value-add opportunities |
Operational performance
and share price;
Respective contributions
to enhance the
relationship |
Communicate timeously
and effectively on
material issues;
Ensure two-way
communication to
strengthen relationships
and establish mutual
interests and objectives;
Enhanced company
transformation;
Enhanced community
service group partners’ delivery;
Act on stakeholder
transformation views
and concerns |
| Media
Open and co-operative
relationship |
Annual media day;
Operational meetings
and site visits;
Media releases |
Thought leadership;
Commentary on industry |
Annual review of media
plan;
Appropriate exposure in
media;
Fair reflection of
company;
Good relationships;
Managed positioning of
the Barloworld brand |
-
4.15 Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Report scope and boundary
Integrated annual report 2011 - Stakeholder engagement
Essentially Barloworld engages a range of stakeholders with various material interests in the group, those whose activities can materially affect the group, and those which the group’s activities will materially affect.
Barloworld recognises that an important component of its value-creation offering is based on focused, inclusive stakeholder engagement. This engagement is essential as a tool for undertaking its business, a lens through which Barloworld can reflect on itself and refine its activities where necessary. Stakeholders in turn derive comfort from being included in the company’s internal processes.
Stakeholders are identified through a range of channels; sometimes stakeholders come forward and identify themselves. Irrespective, where concerns are legitimate, the company addresses these, listens to suggestions and engages honestly.
Accountability for stakeholder engagement is centred in the operational management and functional structures in the group. View the group’s stakeholder policy.
The group’s key stakeholder groupings include:
| • |
Shareholders and providers of capital |
| • |
Employees and their representatives |
| • |
Customers |
| • |
Principals and suppliers |
| • |
Public sector |
| • |
Civil society including local communities and beneficiaries of the groups social economic (SED) and enterprise development (ED) initiatives |
| • |
Empowerment partners |
| • |
Media. |
-
4.16 Approaches to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Stakeholder engagement
View the group’s stakeholder policy.
Shareholders and providers of capital:
The group regularly engages with its shareholders and investor community through:
| • |
Bi-annual results presentations |
| • |
Annual general meetings |
| • |
Annual reporting |
| • |
Investor conferences and presentations |
| • |
Investor site visits |
| • |
Media releases |
| • |
Focused surveys |
Customers
Barloworld’s relationships with customers are critical, therefore the group has comprehensive engagement processes in place across all divisions. By engaging and listening to its customers, the group can quickly determine material issues and respond appropriately.
Numerous individual and collective customer engagement interventions took place during the year focused on long-term relationships and mutual benefit. All divisions appreciate the importance of these interactions and conduct appropriate interventions, including open days and focused surveys.
Engaging with customers includes daily contact to evaluate service levels, invitations to give feedback and suggestions, and regular visits by senior executives.
Principals and suppliers
As a distributor of leading international brands, Barloworld represents a significant number of high-profile global principals.
Distribution agreements, long-term relationships, structured meetings, reporting requirements and performance reviews, and ongoing informal communication ensure frequent contact with principals.
Our people also attend principals’ conferences where strategic issues, including product launches, are shared. Participants have an opportunity to engage with principals and raise concerns, make suggestions and participate in related workshops and discussions. Ongoing principal interactions cover product issues, market positioning, financial performance, customer satisfaction, sustainability matters, territory issues, market information, and the relationship in general.
Mutual benefit, trust and transparency underpin the success of these relationships.
A range of other suppliers including major contractors, long-term and ad hocsuppliers are engaged as appropriate.
Employees and their representatives
Employees are the focus of numerous and detailed engagement processes. These are formal or informal, structured and ad hoc, individual and collective. Employee interaction is key to ensuring that the workplace supports productivity, employee contentment and allows them to further their personal and professional ambitions.
These engagement processes enable employees to make recommendations and influence direction and include:
| • |
Individual meetings |
| • |
Structured team forums |
| • |
Individual and team performance discussions |
| • |
Briefings |
| • |
Anonymous individual perception monitoring at least every two years across the organisation. |
| • |
Meeting with employee representatives (including trade unions) in terms of recognition or industry agreements for collective bargaining, organisational restructuring and other specified matters. |
Public sector, civil society and local communities
We routinely engage government institutions and departments, municipal and local authorities, industry organisations and non-government organisations. We also engage with applicants and beneficiaries of our social economic development and enterprise development initiatives.
Empowerment partners
The company meets with its empowerment partners as required or appropriate for the different categories. Central themes are operational performance, our share price and the respective contributions by the parties to our value-creation activities. We also address the relationship between the company and, its empowerment partners and in the case of our trusts, dividends.
Media
Barloworld regards the media as an important stakeholder and we are committed to accessible, open and transparent engagements. A wide range of initiatives includes statutory disclosures, integrated reporting, advertising ad hoc announcements, editorial comment and publications, formal and informal meetings and briefings.
-
4.17 Key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement, and how the organisation has responded to those key topics and concerns, including through its reporting.
Integrated annual report 2011 - Stakeholder engagement
Through our various engagement processes, we arrive at set of material stakeholder issues which we use to refine our strategy and define report content. These issues are reflected in the following table.
Many of the issues raised by key stakeholder groups are dealt with as part of the engagement that takes place during the year. Given that customers are a key group, and that the business relies solely on their loyalty, issues and concerns raised by customers are prioritised. They are essentially individually focused and service oriented.
Issues raised by employees and investors, principals and other service providers, are also addressed as quickly as possible during the year. Again, given the nature of Barloworld’s activities, geographic spread and range of principals, these are usually of an individual and specific, rather than collective and broad-based.
In annual reporting, these issues are categorised and disclosed with a 12 month perspective focussing on themes rather than the individual issues.
Key topics by stakeholder are shown in the following table:
| Stakeholder |
Material issues raised |
Relevant indicator
|
| Shareholders and providers of capital |
- Nature of returns
- Market perspectives
- Value creation performance
- Under-performing business units
- Strategy and identified growth opportunities
|
|
| Customers |
- Value of products, services and solutions provided
- Ability to enhance customers’ value creation activity
- Customer satisfaction
|
|
| Employees and their representatives |
- Strategy, company performance and results
- Individual conditions of employment
- Security of employment
- Health and safety issues
- Career path and development
- In South Africa, work-skills plans and progress on employment equity
|
|
| Principals and suppliers |
- Product issues
- Market positioning
- Financial performance
- Customer issues and satisfaction
- Sustainability matters
- Territory issues
- Market information
|
|
| Public sector |
- No material issues raised
|
|
| Civil society |
- Relevant industry issues, industry lobbying and responses to proposed legislation or regulation
- Funding requests evaluated
- Enterprise development opportunities identified
|
|
| Empowerment partners |
- Operational performance and share price
- Respective contributions to enhance the relationship
|
|
| Media |
- Open and co-operative relationship
|
|
|